|
Frontline Pakistan : The Struggle with Militant Islam
By YaZahid Hussain,
I.B. Tauris & Co. New York. 2007. pp.213.
Reviewed
by: Mirza Asmer Beg
Zahid Hussain is a journalist,
who has attempted to study the
relationship between
religious extremists and the ISI
(Pakistan’s military
intelligence agency) which led
to the evolution of a culture of
intolerant extremism in
Pakistan. He has studied
the geo-political significance
of Pakistan to the US, in its
war against communism
in Afghanistan, and in its
ongoing global war against
terrorism.
He says that extremism in
Pakistan was initially directed
towards Afghanistan and
Kashmir in India, but after
Pakistan joined America’s war
against terrorism, the
State turned against the
extremists, consequently
inviting their wrath. The
challenges facing Pakistan and
Musharraf have been detailed, to
bring out the
various aspects of the struggle
with radical Islam, as it is
unfolding in Pakistan.
The author argues that when the
Soviets entered Afghanistan, the
Americans relied
almost entirely on the ISI to
allocate weapons to the
mujahideen groups, this
provided the ISI with almost
total control over the
operations in Afghanistan and
made it very powerful. The
resistance in Afghanistan was
projected as a part of
global jihad against communism.
General Zia cleverly used Islam
to consolidate his
power and legitimize his rule.
The effort to Islamise the state
and society had
American blessings. However,
once the Soviet Union collapsed,
the US lost interest
in this surreptitious game. But
the immense power which the army
in Pakistan had
acquired, continued to haunt the
democratic leaders who came to
power subsequently,
and whenever they tried to clip
its wings, they were
unceremoniously sacked.
The events of September 11 in
the US, made Pakistan once again
important for US
policy makers in their fight
against global terrorism.
Pakistan was forced to join
this war, and it meant that it
had to fight those very forces
which it had nurtured,
since the early eighties. This
drastic shift in policy was
decided upon by
Musharraf, without consulting
even the junta which along with
him had ruled the
country since 1999, when he
captured power. He slowly eased
out those officers who
were against this shift and
appointed his loyalists in their
place, and became the
sole holder of power in
Pakistan. He banned five Islamic
extremist groups and warned
that no group would be allowed
to indulge in terrorism in the
name of religion. This
pitted Musharraf against his
former clients and they became
his enemy number one.
However, some elements in the
state security apparatus
continued to clandestinely
support the extremist elements.
All through the eighties and
nineties, a significant
difference between Pakistani
extremist groups and groups like
Al Qaeda, was that while the
former served as
instruments of Pakistan’s
regional policy vis a vis
Afghanistan and India, the
latter had the establishment of
a global Islamic caliphate as
their objective.
However, now some of the more
radical Pakistani groups have
close links with
transnational terrorists.
The author has also studied the
madrasas in Pakistan. He argues
that traditionally
they were centres of basic
religious learning, mostly
attached to local mosques.
“Many of the religious parties
operating the madrasas turned to
militancy courtesy
of the US-sponsored jihad in
Afghanistan”(p.77)The number of
madrasas also
multiplied with the rise of
jihad culture. Government
sources put their number at
13,000, with total enrolment
close to 1.7 million.(p.79).
They received huge funds
from Muslim countries as well as
Pakistani expatriates. The US
actively promoted
militancy and the culture of
jihad. Special textbooks were
published in Dari and
Pashto by the University of
Nebraska-Omaha and funded by
USAID with an aim to
promote jihadist values and
military training. Millions of
such books were
distributed at Afghan refugee
camps and Pakistani madrasas.(p.80).
Zahid Hussain argues that
religious sectarianism presented
the most serious threat
to internal security of
Pakistan. Non-Sunni sects felt
increasingly threatened by
the Sunni orthodoxy propagated
by the power of the state.
After the fall of the Taliban
regime in Afghanistan foreign
operatives fled from
there and looked to turn
Pakistan in a new base for their
terror operations. Given
this shift of the terror network
to Pakistan, America had no
option but to take help
from the Pakistani intelligence
to fight these forces. Musharraf
was forced to
launch an offensive against Al
Qaeda fugitives. However, he was
not much successful
in curbing the spread of
religious extremism in Pakistan,
which continued to pose a
threat to domestic, regional and
global security. Musharraf’s
close alliance with
the US is another factor which
has generated support for
Islamic radicals in
Pakistan. Musharraf’s rule, says
Zahid Hussain has intensified
social, ethnic and
religious differences in
Pakistani society, which could
have disastrous consequences
in the times to come.
The author has also presented
the story of Abdul Qadeer Khan-
the father of
Pakistan’s nuclear programme,
and his international network of
secret nuclear trade,
in a very interesting style.
This book contains a wealth of
information. However, it is weak
on analysis. The
information has been presented
in a narrative style, without
subjecting it to a
rigorous analysis. It
nevertheless is interesting to
read and should be of great use
for researchers and students
interested in this subject. |