|
REDISCOVERING ISLAM
By Furrukh B Ali
It is necessary that we Muslims
face up to the reality that the
Islam that we profess, practise
and preach today is not
working. And has not worked for
a long time. This is true both
for our communal life as
societies, and our personal
lives as individuals.
In Muslim countries and
communities around the world
there is no shortage of mosques
and preachers; prayer and
fasting are common, millions
perform the Hajj every year.
Yet most of these societies are
rife with corruption and
injustice; poverty and
illiteracy prevail; sickness and
malnutrition are common. It is
not just a question of
resources; those Muslim
countries that are lucky enough
to have oil or other natural
resources may have avoided some
of these problems but face other
serious ones (which are also
common throughout the Muslim
world) : lack of individual
freedom and human rights; deep
economic and social class
divisions; materialism and
consumerism; the lower status of
women; the alienation of youth,
etc.
This failure of Muslim societies
to solve internal problems has
been matched by their failures
to deal with external
challenges. In the 19th
and early 20th
centuries they were unable to
withstand the European colonial
and imperial tide that swept
over them. Today, they are not
able to effectively resist the
external political, economic and
cultural pressures to which they
are subject, nor have they been
able to keep up and cope with
the rapid technological changes
occurring in the modern world.
No Muslim society today,
whatever its geography or
history, can be pointed out as
one where humanity has
progressed, or as a model of how
human beings should live.[1]
There has not been such a one
for centuries.
At the personal level, for each
Muslim there is a fundamental
paradox that, whether we face it
or not (and most of us do not),
subconsciously undermines the
central pillar of our faith.
This pillar is our belief in
Allah, in a Being who is
all-powerful, all-knowing,
all-just and all-merciful. But
our daily observation and
experience show that there is
not much justice and mercy in
the world; the strong and wicked
prosper, the meek and innocent
suffer; good deeds bear no
fruit, bad ones reap rewards.
Of course, not in all cases, not
everywhere, not all the time,
but frequently enough to raise
the question : how can we
reconcile this wide prevalence
of injustice and suffering with
our belief in a world in which a
just and merciful God reigns
supreme?
We adopt different methods to
avoid acknowledging (much less
dealing with) these problems and
paradoxes in our personal and
communal lives. Many of us
resort to total denial, and
refuse to believe that there are
any problems at all. Others
avoid these issues by plunging
into blind belief, adopting
dogma and ritual without any
thought or question. Some
acknowledge that there are
problems, but believe that they
are due to Islam not having been
applied correctly or not fully
(this open-ended argument
ignores the inconvenient cases
of Saudi Arabia, Iran and
Taliban Afghanistan). For many
others these problems do not
matter because their adherence
to Islam is purely formal : they
pay it lip service, and practice
it to the extent that is
socially necessary or
convenient. A number of Muslims
blame all our problems on the
“enemies of Islam”, and, in
recent years, some of them have
taken up violent jihad[2]
against these “enemies”, a
solution that does nothing to
deal with the basic issue facing
us all.
This basic issue is that the
Islam we believe in and follow
is not producing the results we
expect in our communal and our
personal lives, the results that
the Quran itself has promised
us. Islam cannot dodge this
issue as other religions do by
promising their rewards and
punishments in the Hereafter.
Instead of avoiding this issue
in one way or another, we must
ask ourselves : why is this so?
We know that this sad state of
affairs was not always the
case. When the Quran brought
Islam into the world some 1500
years ago, it had a remarkable
effect on the warring tribes and
worldly townspeople of Arabia :
it transformed them into a
single people imbued with a
transcendent vision for all
humanity, and a sense of mission
to spread it. The moral fervour
generated in them carried them
far and wide, sweeping away
empires and kingdoms, and
freeing their peoples. In the
succeeding centuries the
civilization that Islam created
was as advanced as any that had
existed so far, and certainly
more broad-based.
The obvious question arises :
could it be that the Islam we
believe in and practise today is
not the same Islam that raised
its earlier followers to such
great heights?
Islam
Then and Now
For its early adherents Islam
was a set of simple ideas and
beliefs relating to Allah, and
the relationship of human beings
to Allah. This overpowering
vision transformed them, and led
them to transform their world.
The essence of the vision was
awareness of, and belief in,
Allah, the creator and sustainer
of the universe, and the role
that Allah expected human beings
to play in their world.
This original Islam had no
dogma, no ritual, no elaborate
code of laws, no special class
of persons learned in the
religion that guided and judged
other believers; in short, none
of the elaborate structure that
now passes for Islam. This
superstructure did not exist in
the early centuries of Islam.[3]
The problem we face is that
Islam today is a complex and
rigid structure, frozen in time,
which overlays and obscures the
original and essential message
that Islam brought to humanity.
Further complicating the issue
is the emergence of a class of
self-styled religious
authorities and “guardians”, so
that there is now a virtual
priestly class in Islam, where
there was no place for one in
its original version.
What has happened to Islam is
not unique; in fact, this has
been the trajectory followed by
all the major religions. Each
of them started off as a simple
message of such power and
relevance that it attracted
significant numbers of
adherents, whose lives were
deeply affected and changed by
their belief in this new
vision. Over time, these
numbers grew greatly, but also,
gradually, the simple, original
message was overlaid by dogma,
ritual and hierarchical
structures, directed and
controlled by a priestly class
(which usually allied itself to
the secular authority in power
in a mutually beneficial
arrangement). Thus, the
revolutionary vision that gave
birth to this transforming
movement became a static,
institutionalized religion.
That is what has occurred with
Islam : it has become just
another religion[4].
If we Muslims wish to rediscover
the original essence of Islam,
we must seek it in the Quran.
All else that goes by the name
of Islam today is superstructure
created later by humans. The
original message that Allah
named Islam and conveyed to
humanity through his Messenger (Rasul
Allah) is now to be found only
in the Quran, and nowhere else.
Understanding the Quran
The Quran is a record of the
divinely inspired[5]
utterances of Rasul Allah over a
period of about 23 years; these
were recorded and memorized at
the time of occurrence and
compiled in the Quran, though
not in chronological sequence.[6]
Because of this, and the long
period over which the text
gradually came into being, the
Quran’s message cannot be
understood by reading it as we
would any other book. To
understand its real message
today we have to adopt a
different method.
The first step is to discover
the correct meaning of the terms
and concepts that occur in it.
To do this we need to take their
meaning as it was understood in
the Arabic of that time, which
may not necessarily be the
meaning developed for them later
on. In the case of an important
or ambiguous term or concept, we
should put together all its
usages in the text, and then
deduce what meaning or meanings
the Quran assigns to it.[7]
Secondly, since various subjects
and issues are dealt with in the
Quran at many different places,
to discover the Quran’s position
on any topic we must put
together all the Quranic
references to it and then study
the coherent picture that
emerges. (It is the failure to
do this that often results in
Muslims, who hold differing
views on some subject, to claim
that the Quran supports their
particular position, quoting one
or two verses in proof thereof).
The third step is to deduce the
overall ideology that the Quran
teaches, within which its
positions on all the major
issues that it covers fit in a
consistent, logical manner.
This process also requires
revisiting the conclusions
arrived at earlier in the
second, and even the first,
stage, to see if a modification
(text-supported, of course)
would enable them to fit better
into the total picture.
However, merely understanding
the meaning of the different
portions of the Quranic text is
not enough, we also need to
understand the significance and
relevance of these meanings for
us today. The Quran deals with
many different types of topics :
some are about the fundamental
issues affecting human beings,
others deal with matters of
contemporary daily life, while
still others refer to
other-worldly issues in
metaphorical language, stories
of earlier times, and allegories
and parables. What should these
various elements of the Quran
mean to us? How do they apply
to us? The answer to these
questions is to be found in the
Quran’s teaching on the system
of divine guidance for humanity
through wahy, which we
shall consider next.
The discussion in this paper is
based on a detailed analysis and
study of the Quran using this
method of interpretation and
understanding, and on the
resulting view of the
comprehensive system propounded
by it. References to Quranic
passages are given below for
many of the arguments made, but
these are mainly for purposes of
illustration, and are not the
only basis for the positions
adopted, which are based on the
detailed study, and the complete
picture that emerges from it.[8]
The
System of Wahy
The Quran says that a particular
human mind, in some fashion, is
inspired with a consciousness of
Reality and Truth.[9]
This can be understood as a
direct, intuitive comprehension
of Allah, and of the
relationship of the universe,
including humans, to Allah.
This person is also imbued with
an imperative urge to formulate
this vision in words, and convey
it to his fellow beings.[10]
The Quran refers to this
individual as a messenger.[11]
However, this messenger is no
more than a human being,[12]
and the mind through which this
vision is given form and
expression is only a human mind.[13]
This mind is confined within the
limits of its own specific
knowledge as well as the general
level of contemporary knowledge
and thought. Thus, when it puts
into words the consciousness of
Reality and Truth that it has
acquired, this is inevitably in
contemporary terms (which would
also enable the message to be
comprehensible and relevant to
its immediate audience).
Similarly, the application of
this consciousness to practical
affairs can only deal with the
actual circumstances then
prevailing.
The message conveyed by such a
messenger is a contemporary
expression of Reality and
Truth. While confined within
the limits of prevailing
knowledge and comprehension, and
dealing with existing
circumstances, the details of
the message conform completely
to the initiating consciousness,
and the truths and realities
comprehended by the latter
underlie everything it
contains. In other words, where
the message deals with abstract
matters (e.g., the reality of
Allah, the divine system, the
Hereafter, etc.) it does so in
terms which can be understood by
its immediate audience, but this
is nevertheless an expression of
the reality of these matters
insofar as the human mind (at
that stage) can grasp them.
Where the message deals with
practical injunctions, these
relate to contemporary matters,
but conform to the fundamental
principles and values that
should govern all human conduct,
anywhere, anytime.
For its own time and place such
a message is completely true and
valid, and applicable in all its
detail. But in places where
circumstances differ materially,
and even in the same area after
the passage of time, the message
becomes of limited validity and
applicability. The practical
injunctions are no longer fully
relevant since people's ways of
living and their social
structures have changed, while
the descriptions of abstract
matters no longer satisfy since
human knowledge and modes of
thought have advanced.
Meanwhile, another messenger is
inspired with wahy,[14]
and conveys to his fellow-beings
another message, which is an
expression of the consciousness
he has acquired of the same
Reality and Truth, but one
dealing with the issues of that
time and place, and appropriate
to the then prevailing level of
human knowledge. Since this new
message, though it differs in
its details, is still based on
the original truths and
realities, it preserves and
verifies them.[15]
In turn, this message also
becomes out-of-date, and is
replaced by another one more
pertinent to the new human
situation.[16]
This system of wahy has
gone on throughout human
history, with numerous
messengers arising in different
times and places. It came to an
end with the message inspired to
Rasul Allah in the 7th century
A.D. (or the 1st century A.H.).
The record of this wahy
is now available to us in the
Quran. This message is of the
same type as all earlier wahy
in that its expression is in
terms appropriate to its own
time and place, and its
practical injunctions relate to
the circumstances then
prevailing. But underlying
these surface forms is the same
Reality and Truth that have been
the basis of all previous
wahy. There is, however,
one major difference between the
Quran and earlier messages : it
is the last of the series and no
more wahy will occur to
take its place. This means that
for us, and for succeeding
generations, the fundamental
truths and realities that have
always been conveyed through
wahy can be discovered only
through the Quran.
This aspect led some Muslim
theologians to advance the view
that every word of the Quran is
applicable for all time to come,
and this proposition has become
a dogma among most Muslims.
This is unfortunate, since not
only is it impossible to
implement this in practice, but
it also contradicts the Quran's
own teaching on the subject.
What are valid and applicable
for all time to come are not the
words of the Quran but the
truths, realities, principles,
values, concepts, etc. that lie
behind, and are the basis of,
these words. It is these that
mirror the Reality and Truth (al-Kitab
and al-Haqq) that were
the initiating source of the
Quranic wahy, and not the
verbal constructions which had
perforce to be formulated within
the limits of contemporary
comprehension and knowledge, and
mostly dealt with contemporary
concerns in a manner appropriate
to the immediate audience and
their circumstances.
To take one example,[17]
the Quran makes a few references
to the slaves then existing in
society in its time, usually in
the context of prescribing
measures to ameliorate their
condition, or to urge their
freeing. However, nowhere does
it call unequivocally for the
abolition of slavery. It is
obvious that the Quran, while
disapproving of the institution,
tolerated it in the then
prevailing form and
circumstances.[18]
On the other hand, the
principles and values underlying
the Quran (e.g., human freedom,
the equality of all human
beings) are totally opposed to
slavery. Which, then, of these
two opposite positions (one
derived from its words, the
other from its underlying
principles) should one regard as
the Quranic injunction valid for
all time to come? The answer is
obvious, and applies generally
to the issue of which element of
the message of the Quran is
valid for us today (and for
succeeding generations) : its
words, or its underlying
principles, values and truths.
The Quran itself makes this
explicit. There is a set of
three passages[19]
that introduce the term umm
al-Kitab (the essence or
core of the divine message), the
only such usage of this term in
the whole Quran. Read together,
these passages say, in summary,
that for every period there is a
divinely inspired message and,
when this period ends, the
fundamentals of the message
remain permanently applicable
while the rest becomes
nullified. These fundamentals
are made clear in the Quran, and
they are the permanent parts of
the divinely inspired message,
the rest is similar to the
transitory elements of the
earlier messages, as those with
knowledge and understanding can
discern. In several other
passages[20]
this basic concept of certain
aspects of the Quran having
lasting significance (as
distinct from others) is
expressed using the term
ahsana (the best).
What, then, are these
fundamentals, the essence of the
message that the Quran brought
into the world, which remain
valid and applicable for us and
for succeeding generations?[21]
We can usefully consider this in
three parts : the fundamental
truths underlying the system
within which we exist; the basic
rule governing human conduct;
and the permanent values which
we should adopt and uphold.
These are the foundations and
the fundamentals of Islam.
The
Quran’s Fundamental Truths
These relate to the reality that
underlies the universe, life and
our humanity (issues such as
Allah, Allah’s interaction with
human beings, the system of the
universe, the role of human
beings, human accountability).
In a short treatment such as
this we shall only highlight two
of the most relevant and
important ones : Allah, and the
purpose of human life on earth.
Allah : The
primary message of the Quran
relates to the fact of Allah,
and the need for human beings to
believe in this fact, and thus
accept Allah as the creator and
sustainer of the universe and
all that is in it, including
them. But this belief and
acceptance has to be an act of
free will.[22]
The starting point
of the Quran’s treatment of this
subject is that there is (and
can be) no proof of Allah’s
existence; that is why it urges
human beings to believe in it
with such urgency and force, and
at such considerable length. It
urges us to study the universe
around us, to look within
ourselves, to ponder the
consequences of our decision,
and then, as free and rational
beings, decide whether we should
make the assumption that Allah
exists, and believe in this. As
part of this discourse the Quran
seeks to convey to us a concept
of Allah through his attributes
(the asma al-husna) and
“actions”.[23]
The Role of Human Beings
: The Quran puts it thus :
And when your Rabb said to the
malaika, “I am going to place in
the earth a khalifa.....”.[24]
This passage (and
similar ones[25]
narrating the allegorical story
of Adam) deal with a central
theme of the Quran : the
emergence of human beings on
earth, and the special position
and role that they have in their
world. The message that this
allegory conveys is that we
achieved our human status when
our minds reached a certain
stage of development, and with
these we acquired the potential
to control and harness all the
forces of nature. We were also
endowed with free will, which
enables us to use these great
powers that we possess for any
purpose we choose. However, the
Quran reminds us that these
potentialities and powers were
given to us so that we could
perform the special role of
khalifa that Allah intends
for us in our world, which
requires us to use them on his
behalf. To do this we will have
to resist the constant
temptation to use these
capabilities for our own ends.[26]
To assist us in this ongoing
struggle, Allah will
periodically send us guidance.
The basic meaning of
khalifa is one who takes
the place of another;[27]
that is why it is used to
signify a surrogate or
substitute,[28]
and also a successor. The key
component of the term’s meaning
is that the surrogate or
successor functions in the
other’s place, and on his
behalf. This is the special
role that the Quran says human
beings are capable of, and which
we are offered : of acting in
Allah’s place in our world.
The Quran bases its
doctrine of the khilafat f’il
ard on, firstly, the
proposition that Allah created
our universe, and it, and all
things in it, exist and function
according to his laws.[29]
Beyond this, however, he has
chosen not to intervene; he
withholds himself from acting in
this world as a causative agent,
and does not interfere in the
operation of its natural laws.
If we pause and
think about this for a minute,
we can see that this, in fact,
is how things actually are in
our world.[30]
Everything in the universe is
bound in a certain mode of
existence and
behaviour (with one notable
exception).
The mighty galaxies travel in
pre-determined paths and speeds;
the huge stars follow ordained
life cycles; the planets move
unwaveringly in their orbits.
The microcosm is no less firmly
regulated than the macrocosm;
each particle has its inherent
properties and must conform to
them; the sub-atomic universe
appears to be as unitary a
system as the wider universe.
Life itself comes into being and
develops according to
evolutionary laws. Plants live
and die in the established
rotation of the seasons.
Animals exist bound in the iron
bands of instinct, their
behaviour
fixed within narrow limits.[31]
Nowhere in this
orderly universe do we see a
“divine hand” intervening to
alter the operation of the
system. As human knowledge has
increased, the many inexplicable
and seemingly random natural
events that occur, which were
once ascribed to God’s doing,
can no longer be so considered.
It is now known[32]
that they all have natural
causes, and occur according to
natural laws.[33]
The whole edifice of science and
technology is based on this
reality.
The second basis of
the doctrine of the khilafat
f’il ard is that
the only entity in the world
with complete freedom to act in
any way it chooses is the human
being; we have total freedom of
choice, so much so that we even
have the choice of refusing to
believe in or acknowledge Allah.[34]
Here again, as in the natural
world, Allah does not
intervene in or direct human
affairs,[35]
nor does he affect the outcome
of human actions and choices.
This is also what we actually
observe. Human beings, in
contrast to everything else,
appear free to order their lives
and determine their
behaviour
in any way they choose.
Recorded history and our own
observation disclose human
beings living, individually and
collectively, in many different
modes, according to the highest
standards conceivable as well as
the lowest, in pursuit of all
kinds of aims and goals as well
as none at all, performing
actions which we would call
saintly, and also those of the
utmost depravity. This vast
variety is proof enough that
neither our inner nature nor any
external constraint compels
human beings to live and act in
any particular pattern or mode.
How they live or what they do is
for them to decide. It is true
that not many of us are able, in
practice, to make such free
choices, but, in principle,
there is no insurmountable
barrier to prevent us from doing
so. What any human has done, it
is possible for other humans to
also do.
We also see that the outcomes of
human actions and choices follow
no discernible pattern relating
to their ethical or moral
quality, or their conformity or
otherwise to any divine or
religious directives. However,
influenced by religious
teaching, many people still
consider occurrences affecting
humans and human societies to be
due to specific decisions by
God. When, as often happens,
good deeds have bad outcomes
while evil actions result in
gains, the wicked prosper and
the virtuous or innocent suffer,
such believers are forced to
resort to implausible excuses
and arguments, ignoring the
implications for the kind of God
who would act thus, and for the
omnipotence and justice of the
divine system that they claim is
operating in human affairs.
Such a claim is neither
supported by the Quran nor by
our own experience.
The third basis of
this doctrine is that Allah acts
in our world
through the agency of humans.[36]
Based on these
premises the Quran expounds the
doctrine of the khilafat f’il
ard. Affirming
that Allah withholds himself
from acting as a causative agent
in our world, and acknowledging
the freedom of choice and action
that humans possess, the Quran
offers human beings the role of
Allah’s
khulafa f’il ard.
It urges us to assume the
responsibility of acting as
Allah’s surrogates, to act in
his place as causative beings in
our world, to work towards his
goals, to do all that he would
have done in our world if he had
so chosen. Apart from the
pivotal allegory of Adam, the
Quran refers to this task, this
role, this Allah-human
relationship, repeatedly and in
many different ways.[37]
The khilafat f’il
ard is indeed a heavy burden
for human beings to assume. In
accepting it we agree to live
our lives for Allah, and not for
ourselves. Whatever obligations
he has assumed in our world, we
undertake to fulfil. (For
example, when the Quran says
(6:11) that the provision of
sustenance to every living
creature is Allah’s
responsibility, this is an
obligation that we are required
to discharge on his behalf). To
be able to fulfil all these
responsibilities we have to
first develop the great
potentialities with which he has
endowed us, so as to achieve as
many of his powers and qualities
as apply to our world. With
these we must strive,
individually and collectively,
to further his goals, not our
own. We stand for Allah in our
world, and must fashion
ourselves and our actions
accordingly.[38]
Basis of
Conduct
The Quran uses the term amal
as-salihat to prescribe the
essential basis of conduct for
human beings. The primary
meaning of the root for salih
is to remove a shortcoming,
defect or handicap, and bring
something to its proper and
rightful state. In the context
of the khilafat f’il ard,
this basic rule requires us to
make good the deficiencies and
limitations in human beings,
internal and external, in
ourselves and others, and
achieve the stature and
capability necessary for beings
who must act on behalf of Allah
in our world. It requires us to
act, individually and
collectively, to make this world
into its rightful condition, and
thus, through human
instrumentality, to restore
Allah as a causative agent to a
world within which he has chosen
not to act as one.
The overriding importance that
the Quran attaches to this rule
of action is shown by its
linking of this conduct with the
essential requirement to being a
Muslim: iman (belief),
and the frequent use of this
formula as the conduct for which
Allah promises the ultimate
reward.[39]
Permanent Values
The values that should permeate
our lives and govern our actions
can be derived from the Quran,
many of them from the attributes
of Allah (of course, not all of
the attributes are applicable to
human beings). The most
important of these are :
Freedom :
This, according to the Quran, is
the essential and distinguishing
quality of human beings. Thus,
maintaining our humanity
requires us to promote and
preserve this value for each and
every human being.
Love : The
love which the Quran extols is
the one based on the term
rahma. The root for this
term is a name for the womb, and
the term refers primarily to the
nurturing, compassionate love
that a mother has for her
child. Maternal love is the
foundation for our humanity; it
is this (and the response it
elicits in every human being :
love of the mother) that enabled
(even propelled) us to evolve to
the human stage. Perhaps the
most frequently used names for
Allah in the Quran are
ar-Rahman and ar-Rahim,
signifying the nurturing love
that the Creator has for his
creation. (Unfortunately, when
Islam became a religion, the
concept of Allah was derived
from the most powerful being
then on earth, the absolute
ruler who wielded his power
according to his whims,
unconstrained by any rule or law
or other consideration. For his
helpless subjects, the highest
and most desirable virtue in
such a ruler would be mercy, and
that is what rahma came
to mean, and has since
remained).
Justice : In
the Quran’s references to
Allah’s dealings with humans the
constant theme is that of
justice. In our dealings with
each other, and in the societies
we establish, this is a value
that should figure prominently.
The Final Word
The final word must remain, as
always, with the Quran. And the
Quran’s final words could not be
clearer on this issue. Based on
both internal and external[40]
evidence, the final substantive
portion of the Quran received by
Rasul Allah was :
For you this day have I brought
to its culmination your way of
life
[41] and bestowed
upon you My final favour, and
approved for you Islam as a way
of life
(5:3).
[42]
What this passage tells us is
that the way of life that the
unfolding Quran and Rasul Allah
were teaching evolved during
that period, and reached its
final form towards the end of
Rasul Allah’s life. The Quran
gives this way of life the name
Islam. The root for this term
has many different meanings, but
most of these relate to
conditions or states (e.g.,
perfection, security, peace,
beauty). Among those that refer
to actions the primary sense is
to give or relinquish oneself to
someone or something.[43]
Thus, Islam means that way of
life in which one is required to
hand oneself over to Allah, to
commit one’s being to Allah.
This is precisely what the
khilafat f’il ard requires :
that we commit ourselves and our
lives to fulfilling Allah’s
purposes and obligations.
Incorporating the various
meanings of the root for this
word, we can define Islam as
that way of life in which human
beings surrender themselves to
the role that Allah has given
them, of being his khulafa
in our world. Thereby we
preserve him in a world in which
he has chosen not to act, and
thus, preserving him, we
preserve both ourselves and the
world. In this effort we climb
upwards, shedding our inherited
flaws, towards perfection and
completion, and our world moves
thus with us. It is in this way
of life that we and our world
can find peace, security and
tranquility, and through it
alone that human striving can be
truly productive. A person who
walks in this way is a Muslim
(one who has committed himself
or herself to Allah).
This is the Islam that the Quran
offers all human beings. It
urges us, as free and rational
persons, to recognize the
Supreme Being who is the creator
and sustainer of our universe,
and whose laws govern it. It
tells us that we possess the
potentiality to become the
surrogates, the representatives,
of Allah in our world, and
offers us this role. To
undertake this responsibility,
to act for Allah in our world
and fulfil his purposes and
obligations in it, this is the
way of life that is Islam.
For those of us who call
ourselves Muslims today, this is
the Islam that we have to
rediscover from the Quran. But
before we can do that we have to
realize that the religion that
we profess and practise is a far
cry from the Islam that the
Quran brought into the world
some 1500 years ago. Until we
recognize this undoubtedly
painful reality and return to
the original guidance we
received, we cannot hope to
garner the rich harvest that our
early forbears reaped so
abundantly, so different from
our fallen state today.
It is fitting to end this paper
with two passages from the
Quran, the first being one of
its most powerful verses.
Referring to the role offered to
human beings, it says :
We did offer the Trust to the
skies and the earth and the
mountains, but they were afraid
to accept it. Human beings,
however, undertook to bear it,
but surely they have ignored it,
and indeed they have failed to
accord it its rightful due
(33:72).
However, in the second passage
we can discern a message of hope
– provided we can retrace our
steps and rediscover the
original message that was given
to us :
Those who obscure the clear
message and guidance that We
have sent down, when We have
made it so explicit in the Book,
it is they who are banished
(from Allah’s guidance), and
deservedly so. But those who
turn back and remedy this error,
and make manifest (the clear
message sent down), it is to
them that I return; and I am
oft-returning, compassionate
(2:159-160).
[1]
In the latest
(2006) ranking of
countries of the world
on the Human Development
Index by the United
Nations Development
Programme (UNDP), the
first Muslim country
appears at No. 33;
however, excluding the
small, oil-rich
sheikhdoms, the first
Muslim country comes at
No. 61. Saudi Arabia,
the richest and most
religious Muslim
country, is at No. 76.
The Arab Human
Development reports
(prepared by Arab
scholars and issued by
the UNDP) paint a
sobering picture of the
human condition in these
societies. A telling
statistic : the 2002 AHD
report says that half
of the young Arabs
polled wanted to
emigrate from their
countries! In the
latest Transparency
International Corruption
Index (for 2006), 10 of
the 19 countries at the
bottom of the list (most
corrupt) are Muslim
countries. From the
top, the first Muslim
country is at No. 31 (www.transparency.org).
The 2007 Trafficking in
Persons Report, issued
by the US State
Department, deals with
what it calls “a
modern-day form of
slavery”. Of the 16
countries with the worst
record (Tier 3), 11 are
Muslim countries
(including Saudi
Arabia).
[2]
Since this article is
for the general reader,
I am not adopting fully
the usual
transliteration system
for Arabic.
[3]
The raw material
and the tools with which
this superstructure was
later gradually
constructed (the
standard hadith collections and the
doctrines of the fiqh
schools) did not
begin to be assembled
and formalized until the
third century A.H.
[4]
The major religions have
played a useful role in
history, and still do in
many respects. They
promoted social
cohesion, developed
cultures, fostered
ethical systems,
sometimes resisted
tyranny, and provided
human beings with a
strong faith to deal
with the vicissitudes of
life. But they also
developed into
institutions of control
and exploitation, often
exercising their power
in reactionary and
negative ways, stifling
freedom and progress.
Even though the dogmas
they profess enable many
individuals to acquire a
faith that helps them to
become better persons
and lead better lives,
overall they are often
an obstacle to human
progress and
development.
[5]
The most accurate
translation of the term
wahy is
“inspiration”, and not
the commonly used
“revelation”, which is a
term borrowed from other
religions. The primary
meaning of the root for
wahy is a swift
signal, conveying some
meaning or giving some
indication.
[6]
The placing of
verses in the text was
directed by Rasul Allah;
this would have been
necessary to enable the
suras to be
memorized in a standard
format (also see Quran
75:17). Thus, their
mixing up was
deliberate, perhaps to
break for future readers
any link to particular
events or circumstances,
and thus generalize the
message.
[7]
For an example of
how this method can
reveal meanings quite
different from those
commonly accepted, see
the discussion on the
term fath in the
author’s article, Al-Hudaybiya: An
Alternative Version
(The Muslim World, Jan.
1981: 47) [Reprinted in
Uri Rubin, ed., The
Life of Muhammad
(Aldershot, UK: Ashgate
Publishing, 1998)].
[8]
The author hopes to
publish the results of
this study in due
course.
[9]
The Quran uses
the terms al-Kitab
and al-Haqq to
represent these concepts
in the context of wahy. Among many
references in the Quran,
typical are 2:213; 3:78;
10:37; 22:54; 35:31.
[10]
The phenomenon
can be understood as
somewhat similar (though
of far greater depth and
complexity, and, of
course, significance) to
that of the genius
inspired by a vision and
impelled to express it
in great art or music.
[11]
The common usage
in English of the term
“prophet” is incorrect.
The Quran uses the terms
rasul and nabi,
both of which mean a
conveyor of a message or
information.
[12]
See, for example,
Quran 12:109;
14:11;
16:43; 17:93, 95; 21:7;
23:23-50; 25:20; 41:6.
[13]
There are many
indications of this in
the Quran, but the
definitive verse is
22:52. The term shaytan
is used in
the Quran for negative
impulses, attitudes,
thoughts, and other
failings of the human
mind.
[14]
On the series of
messengers, see, for
example, Quran 2:213;
10:47; 16:36; 23:44;
35:24.
[15]
On the
preservation and
verification of earlier
wahy, see, for
example, Quran 2:89, 97,
101; 4:47; 5:15, 46, 48;
6:93; 10:37; 35:31.
[16]
On the
replacement of an
earlier wahy by a
later one, see, for
example, Quran 2:106;
5:44-48; 13:38-39;
16:101; 98:3.
[17]
Other examples, to which
the same argument
applies, are the
injunctions regarding
the punishments for
various offences,
retaliation or qisas
(2:178-179),
polygamy, concubinage,
women witnesses, etc.
[18]
It was a relatively
benign form of slavery,
more akin to indentured
service, and was an
integral part of the
social and economic
systems. Slaves were
lower status members of
the families, clans and
tribes that constituted
Arab society. Most of
them would have lost
both livelihood and
protection if suddenly
freed.
[19]
Quran 13:38-39; 43:2-5;
and 3:6. Linked to
these is 39:23.
[20]
See, for example, Quran
29:46; 39:18, 55;
92:6-7, 9-10. 7:145
applies the same concept
to Moses’ time. Also
see 98:2-3 for the same
meaning conveyed in a
different form.
[21]
Future generations will
need to keep going back
to the Quran to see if,
from their new
perspectives, it
provides any new
guidance for their times
and circumstances.
[22]
See, for example,
Quran 2:256; 10:99;
13:31; 18:29; 32:13;
43:20; 74:55; 76:3.
[23]
The concept given in the
Quran is one our minds
can understand and
relate to. It cannot
convey the “reality” of
Allah, since this is
beyond the limits of
finite human
understanding.
[24]
Commenting on
this verse (2:30) Ibn
Khaldun wrote in his
great treatise on human
history : This is the
meaning of civilization
(Al-Muqaddimah,
trans. F. Rosenthal (New
York, 1958), vol. I,
85).
[25]
2:30-38; 7:11-25;
15:28-42; 17:61-64;
18:50; 20:115-126;
38:71-85.
[26]
The Quran uses the term
malaika to
represent the forces of
nature, and the term Iblis to represent
those elements of human
nature that tend to lead
humans away from Allah’s
path.
[27]
See, for example, Quran
7:69, 74, 142; 11:57;
19:59; 25:62.
[28]
“An inscription
from South Arabia (in a
language cognate with
classical Arabic) shows
that the corresponding
word was there used
about AD 543 in the
sense of ‘viceroy’ and
this usage may have
affected that in
classical Arabic....” W.
Montgomery Watt, Islamic Political
Thought (Edinburgh:
The University Press,
1968), 33. This usage
is confirmed in Quran
7:142.
[29]
See, for example,
Quran 13:15; 16:49;
21:33; 30:25-26; 65:12.
[30]
This, surely, is the
primary test for the
validity of a belief :
that it is consistent
with our observation and
experience of the real
world. It is to avoid
this test that religions
seek to distract and
over-awe their followers
through their
otherworldly and
supernatural dogmas and
beliefs, which they are
required to accept
blindly.
[31]
Some recent
research indicates that
higher mammals may
display some rudimentary
volition. This would be
entirely consistent with
the evolution of the
animal brain into the
human form.
[32]
Of course, many
still don’t know this,
or refuse to acknowledge
it. After the Katrina
hurricane and the South
Asian earthquake in
2005, some Christian and
Muslim religious
figures, respectively,
claimed that this was
God’s punishment on
sinners. They
blissfully ignored what
kind of God it was (on
whose behalf they were
so smugly claiming to
speak) whose wrath fell
mainly on the poor, the
helpless and innocent
children.
[33]
We should
remember that chance and
randomness are part of
the natural system.
See, for example, Quran
3:139; 7:94-95; 10:24;
11:9-11; 21:35;
30:36-37; 53:43;
89:15-16.
[34]
See, for example,
Quran 10:108; 13:31;
18:29; 43:40; 74:55;
76:3.
[35]
Even Rasul Allah is told
that there is no
guarantee that he will
see the defeat of those
opposing him, or that he
will not die before the
success of his mission (Quran
10:46; 13:40; 40:77;
43:41-42).
[36]
See, for example, Quran
2:251; 4:75; 22:40;
36:47; 47:7.
[37]
Some of the concepts the
Quran uses are ahd
Allah, auliya Allah,
ansar Allah, shuhada
l’illah, amana b’illah,
dhikr Allah, sabil
Allah, and others.
It is not possible to
discuss these in this
paper.
[38]
We have forgotten the
real significance of the
tradition followed from
the earliest days of
Islam whereby a Muslim
commences every action
with a bismillah
: in the name of Allah.
[39]
There are 25
references relating to
the reward of al-janna (e.g.,
2:25; 18:30; 22:14;
32:19; 45:30; 84:25) and
another 24 speaking of
reward generally (e.g.,
2:277; 3:56; 35:7; 41:8;
103:3).
[40]
This wahy
occurred during Rasul
Allah’s final Hajj,
according to a hadith
from Umar
b.al-Khattab (Bukhari
2:34; also reported in
other collections). He
fell ill two to three
months later, and died
soon after.
[41]
The term used is din,
which properly has this
broad significance.
When Islam became a
religion, this term was
limited to mean
religious dogma and
practice.
[42]
One reason, perhaps, why
this passage has not
received the attention
it merits is that it has
been placed in the
middle of verse 3 (which
belongs to a much
earlier period) even
though the context is
quite different. It is
possible that, in those
final days, Rasul Allah
did not get an
opportunity to designate
the appropriate placing
of this passage.
[43]
When Islam became a
religion, and the
concept of Allah became
that of an omnipotent
ruler, the meaning
adopted for this term
was “submission”, the
most appropriate
attitude of a subject in
a kingdom. It has so
remained, allowing the
many self-styled
intermediaries to demand
absolute obedience to
their version of the
“king’s” commands.
|
|