|
Islam and the Charge of Anti-Semitism
By Asma Afsaruddin
The well-known Jewish
economic historian of the
medieval Mediterranean
world, S. D. Goitein,
observes in one of his works
that a Jewish document
circulating in the Middle
Ages described Islam as "an
act of God's mercy." Having
been bombarded by the term
"Islamic anti-Semitism" in the Western
popular media, many will do
a double-take on reading
this today.
Yet, significant
historical evidence can be
harnessed to support this
assessment made by the very
people that Islam supposedly
regards with disdain. Jews,
like their Christian
counterparts, in the Middle
East, North Africa, and
medieval Spain under Islamic
rule, enjoyed considerable
autonomy within their
communities, being governed
by their own religious
leaders and laws. Although
their circumstances were far
from idyllic, Jews in the
Islamic world on the whole
led far less restricted
lives than their brethren in
medieval Europe. As Bernard
Lewis, another Jewish
author, pointed out in his
book The Jews of Islam,
there is no theological
basis in Islam for
prejudice against Jews as
such. After all, Jews are
portrayed in the Qur'an
(2:62, etc.) as constituting
a salvific community, just
as Muslims and Christians do.
However, like religious
and ethnic minorities in
practically all societies
throughout time, Jews were
occasionally subjected to
repressive and
discriminatory measures.
These measures tended to be
primarily contingent on
specific political
circumstances and the whims
of local rulers in various
historical settings,
sometimes justified on the
basis of exclusivist (mis)interpretations
of religious texts. To say
this is not to exonerate
such acts but to point to
their historically
contingent and ad-hoc
nature, as opposed to
consistent and
institutionalized policies
of discrimination.
The historical record
taken as a whole fails to
support the claim made in
some circles today that
persecution of Jews in the
medieval Islamic world was
endemic and systematic and
that it helps explain
current tempers in the Middle
East. In fact, the existence of
relative toleration and
acceptance of religious
minorities in various Islamic
societies are regarded by many
historians as rather unique by
the standards of the pre-modern
period. While medieval Europe
routinely associated Jews with
the devil and attributed
murderous attitudes to them,
“classical Islam did not display
such irrational thinking about
the Jews,” affirms Mark Cohen,
who teaches Jewish history at
Princeton University.
Christians and Jews
actively contributed, for
example, to the overall economic
and intellectual life in these
societies. What has been
described as a Judeo-Arabic or
Judeo-Islamic civilization
reached its apogee in Muslim
Spain. Jews, like Christians,
occasionally attained high
positions in various Islamic
administrations. In the
fifteenth century, the Muslim
sultan of Fez ‘Abd al-Haq named
the Jewish Aaron Ben Battas as
his prime minister. When the
celebrated Jewish philosopher
Moses ben Maimonides, who had
served as Saladdin's court
physician, died in 1204, his
death was officially mourned by
Jews and Muslims alike for three
days in Cairo. Maimonides,
after all, was not an outsider.
Called in Arabic Musa ibn Maymun,
he wrote most of his works in
Arabic and moved easily in
Muslim and Jewish circles.
During the Crusades, King
Richard the First tried to lure
Ibn Maymun away to his court in
Europe but the latter declined,
preferring to stay with his
Muslim patrons.
Evidence of Jewish-Muslim
solidarity may be found
throughout the pre-modern and
early modern periods. Medieval
Jews and Muslims had joint
custodianship of religious
shrines, like that of Ezekiel in
Iraq. Through the early modern
period, Muslims and Jews
sometimes made common political
cause against injustice. For
instance, during the Dreyfus
affair of the late nineteenth
century in France when a French
Jewish soldier was unfairly
accused of espionage there,
public opinion in Arab countries
was critical of the bigotry
against Jews prevalent in French
society at that time. Some
Jewish scholars of Islam in the
early twentieth century, like
the Hungarian Ignaz Goldziher,
who studied at the famous al-Azhar
university in Cairo, condemned
in his writings the bias
displayed by some European
Orientalists towards Muslims and
Semites in general.
The testimony of medieval
Jews to Islam's merciful nature,
as mentioned by Goitein, stands
today in stark contrast to the
charges of anti-Semitism now
being hurled liberally at
Muslims and their societies.
These charges imply that innate
prejudice towards Jews was and
remains a hallmark of the
Islamic tradition and practices.
This is an unfair, monolithic
characterization of a variegated
religious tradition which has
enshrined tolerance in its
foundational texts but whose
practitioners, admittedly, have
not consistently practiced it.
Convenient amnesia of an earlier
period of Muslim-Jewish
coexistence and even symbiosis,
which left a lasting
contribution to human
civilization as we now know it
to be, permits the formulation
of such totalizing statements.
Those who have a better sense of
history will point rather to the
role of specific factors, such
as the current Middle East
crisis and a perceived Western
tilt towards Israel at the
expense of Arab nations, in
provoking expressions of hostile
sentiments towards specifically
Israelis, and by extension
sometimes, Jews in a number of
Islamic societies today.
Goitein's observation
should serve to remind us that
manifestation of anti-Jewish
sentiment in parts of the
contemporary Islamic world,
indefensible as it is, should be
seen in their proper historical
and political contexts. His
observation should also prod
Muslims into pondering why the
merciful nature of their
religion seems less than evident
today in the view of a
considerable cross-section of
people. The Qur’an (5:8) warns
us, “Stand up firmly for God, as
witnesses to fair dealing, and
let not the hatred of others
towards you make you swerve to
wrong and depart from justice."
Even in the face of immense
wrong-doing, believers are
counseled by the Qur’an to hold
fast to the requirements of
justice and fairness in their
dealings with others. There are
no ifs or buts involved in this
verse. This is an absolute
commandment that cannot be
contravened under any
circumstance. This divine
counsel has never been more
relevant in our lives today than
at the present time and it
should serve to mobilize us into
stamping out bigotry among
ourselves, whatever its cause
may be. |