|
GOD AND GLOBALIZATION:RELIGION IN THE GLOBAL VILLAGE
By Ali A. Mazrui
One
of the most memorable verses of
the Qur’an is a celebration of human
diversity. Through the Qur’an God
addresses the human species as a
whole. He says:
O humankind! We have created
you from a single pair of male and
female, And made you into Nations
and tribes, that you may know each
other [respectfully]. Verily the
most honoured among you in the sight
of God is the most righteous among
you. God is the most knowledgeable,
the best informed. [Sura
Hujurat, 49 verse 13]
Yaa ayuha Nasu! Innaa khalaqnakum
min dhakarin wa unthaa wa jaalnaa
kum shu’uban wa qabaila li-taarafu.
Inna akramakum i’nda ‘llahi atqaakum.
Inna ‘Allaha alimun khabir.
At the core of this Qur’anic verse
is a celebration of human differentiation.
Education is about understanding
ourselves (auto-comprehension),
about understanding other people
(ultra-comprehension) and about
understanding our environment (eco-comprehension).
On issues of war and peace, friction
versus friendship, conflict versus
cooperation, education is ultimately
about how we relate to human diversity.
Let me be presumptuous and assert
that God is on the side of creative
diversity. Different religions have
emphasized this fact in their different
ways. Let me quote again from a
lesser known scripture in the United
States – the Qur’an. Muslims believe
that the Qur’an is the word of God
directly. In the Qur’an God addresses
human kind quite simply as follows:
We have created you from a male
and female and made you into nations
and tribes that you may know each
other.
[Qur’an: Chapter 49, Verse
13]
Note the plurality of “nations and
tribes” and the singularity of purpose
– that “you may get to know each
other.” The idea is for human beings
to seek to know each other across
tribal and national divides. What
about across the religious divide?
The Qur’an is explicit on that also.
It says emphatically that coercion
and confession do not go together.
The Qur’an says, “There is no compulsion
in religion” [Laa ikrahu fi’din].
The God of diversity approves of
diversity of the religious experience
also.
We created…you nations and tribes
that you may know one another.
But as the population of the human
race grew and grew, it seemed unlikely
that people would get to know each
other as God planned. This is when
history set in motion the process
of human amalgamation. The number
of individuals continued to grow
almost endlessly…but over time the
number of tribes and nations decreased.
Through conquest, spread of languages,
expansion of religions, and empire-building,
human clans amalgamated into larger
tribes, and small societies merged
with bigger nations.
When the white man first arrived
in Southern Africa five centuries
ago, there were far fewer people
but more numerous little clans than
there are now. Shaka Zulu alone
conquered so many non-Zulu clans
and absorbed them into a larger
and larger Zulu nation in the eighteenth
and nineteenth centuries.
Empire, migration, trade, and cultural
expansion increased human interaction
and social intercourse across vast
distances. The history of human
kind is, on the whole, a history
of changing boundaries and expanding
societal scale.
We have created you...nations
and tribes that you may know each
other.
These changing social and economic
boundaries were slowly leading towards
a process which we now call globalization.
Let us now examine this wider phenomenon
in greater detail.
Africa and the Middle East in this
twenty first century are likely
to be among the final battlegrounds
of the forces of globalization –
for better or for worse. This phenomenon
called GLOBALIZATION has its winners
and losers. In the initial phases,
most of the developing countries
have been among the losers as they
have been increasingly marginalized.
There are universities in the United
States which have more computers
than the computers available in
a developing country like Yemen
with millions people. This has been
the great digital divide. The distinction
between the Haves and Have-nots
has now coincided with the distinction
between Digitised and the “Digi-prived”.
Let us begin with the challenge
of a definition. What is globalization?
It consists of processes that lead
toward global interdependence and
the increasing rapidity of exchange
across vast distances. The word
globalization is itself quite new,
but the actual processes toward
global interdependence and exchange
started centuries ago.
Four forces have been major engines
of globalization across time: religion,
technology, economy, and empire.
These have not necessarily acted
separately, but often have reinforced
each other. For example, the globalization
of Christianity started with the
conversion of Emperor Constantine
I of Rome in 313. The religious
conversion of an emperor started
the process under which Christianity
became the dominant religion not
only of Europe but also of many
other societies later ruled or settled
by Europeans. The globalization
of Islam began not with converting
a ready-made empire, but with building
an empire almost from scratch. The
Umayyads and Abbasids put together
bits of other people’s empires (e.g.,
former Byzantine Egypt and former
Zoroastrian Persia, for example)
and created a whole new civilization.
The forces of Christianity and Islam
sometimes clashed. In Africa the
two religions competed for the soul
of a continent.
Voyages of exploration were another
major stage in the process of globalization.
Before Columbus explored the Western
hemisphere, Muslims navigated the
Eastern hemisphere. Vasco da Gama
and Christopher Columbus opened
up a whole new chapter in the history
of globalization. Economy and empire
were the major motives. There followed
the migration of people. The Portuguese
helped to build Fort Jesus in the
originally Muslim town of Mombasa.
The migration of the Pilgrim Fathers
to America was in part a response
to religious and economic imperatives
in Europe. Demographic globalization
reached its height in the Americas
with the influx of millions of people
from other hemispheres. In time,
the population of the United States
became a microcosm of the population
of the world, for it contained immigrants
from almost every society on earth.
Islam first arrived in the Americas
with enslaved Africans.
The making of America was the making
of a globalized society or universal
nation. South Africa had Dutch settlers
three centuries ago – a potential
universal nation on the African
continent was initiated.
The Industrial Revolution in Europe
represents another major chapter
in the history of globalization.
This marriage between technology
and economics resulted in previously
unknown levels of productivity.
Europe began to leave the Muslim
world truly behind. Europe’s prosperity
whetted its appetite for new worlds
to conquer. The Atlantic slave trade
was accelerated, moving millions
of Africans from one part of the
world to another. Europe’s appetite
also went imperial on a global scale,
and one European people, the British,
built the largest and most far-flung
empire in human experience, most
of which lasted until the end of
World War II. Countries like Iraq
were carved out artificially by
the British and separated from Kuwait.
The French cut out Lebanon and separated
it from Syria.
The two world wars were themselves
manifestations of globalization.
The twentieth century was the only
one to witness globalized warfare:
during 1914-18 (resulting in collapse
of the Ottomans) and again during
1939-45 (Muslim countries which
were devastated included Libya and
Indonesia). The Cold War (1948-89)
was yet another manifestation of
globalization, for it was a global
power rivalry between two alliances:
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization
(NATO) and the Warsaw Pact. Turkey
was a Muslim member of NATO. While
the two world wars were militarily
the most destructive, empirically
the Cold War was potentially the
most dangerous, for it carried the
seeds of planetary annihilation
via nuclear warfare.
The final historical stage of globalization
came when the Industrial Revolution
was joined with the new Information
Revolution. These are the revolutions
which put the West truly ahead of
the Muslim world. Interdependence
and exchange became dramatically
dependent upon the computer. The
most powerful country eventually
was the United States. Pax Americana
mobilized three of globalization’s
four engines: technology, economy,
and empire. Although in the second
half of the twentieth century this
Pax Americana apparently did not
seek to promote a particular religion,
it did help to promote secularism
and the ideology of the separation
of church and state. On balance,
the impact of Americanization probably
has been harmful to religious values
worldwide, whether intended or not.
Americanized Hindu youth, Americanized
Buddhist teenagers, or indeed Americanized
Muslim youngsters at home and abroad
are far less likely to be devout
adherents of their faiths than their
non-Americanized counterparts. The
United States has been a secularizing
force in Africa and elsewhere. Paradoxically,
the United States itself is arguably
the most church-going country among
industrialized democracies.
The Global Village and the
Universal Nation
In the new millennium the forces
of globalization are likely to continue,
against the background of the meaning
of the twentieth century in world
history. As the twenty-first century
opened, scholars have interpreted
globalization in three distinct
ways.
I: Forces which are transforming
the global market and creating new
economic interdependency across
vast distances. Petroleum put the
Muslim world in the mainstream of
the global economy.
II: Forces which are exploding into
the information superhighway - expanding
access to data and mobilizing the
computer and the Internet into global
service. This tendency is marginalizing
Africa. The Muslim world is less
central to informational globalization.
III: All forces which are turning
the world into a global village
- compressing distance, homogenizing
culture, accelerating mobility,
and reducing the relevance of political
borders. Under this comprehensive
definition, globalization is the
gradual villagization of the world.
These forces have been at work in
the Muslim world long before the
European colonization. Indeed, Islam
had itself been a globalizing force
in history.
As we have indicated, the twentieth
century was the only century which
had world wars - 1914 to 1918, and
1939 to 1945. This was the only
century which created world diplomatic
institutions - the League of Nations
and the United Nations. By the year
2000 some 50 members of the UN were
also members of the Organization
of the Islamic conference.
This was the only century which
created a World Bank - the International
Bank for Reconstruction and Development
(IBRD) with the International Development
Association. The twentieth century
also issued a Universal Declaration
of Human Rights - adopted by the
United Nations in 1948. This was
the only century which established
a United Nations University in Tokyo,
a World Health Organization [WHO]
in Geneva, a World Trade Organization
in Geneva, and an International
Court of Justice at The Hague.
Then God created America and
permitted the United States to become
the first universal nation in history.
No country on earth encompasses
as many races, religious faiths,
national and tribal origins, as
the United States of America does.
Within its own boundaries, the United
States has been a human laboratory.
It has been experimenting with God’s
imperative of diversity – “we
have created you…nations and tribes
that you may know each other.”
Today the population of the United
States is descended from a thousand
tribes and many dozens of nations.
Within its own borders the United
States has begun to facilitate God’s
imperative of diversity. Progress
in America’s political and social
history has consisted of two steps
forward, one step backward, advance
and retreat. But the total American
balance-sheet is a record of human
achievement, however imperfect and
sometimes painful.
This year the United States celebrates
the fiftieth anniversary of the
U.S. Supreme Court decision, Brown
versus the Board of Education which
came down way back in May 1954.
The decision struck down any constitutional
basis of racial segregation. It
was a major step forward towards
rapid integration in God’s laboratory
of diversity.
The United States is indeed a democracy
at home, but is now also an empire
abroad. As a democracy at home,
the United States has done more
than any other nation in history
to create a political system increasingly
respectful of racial, ethnic and
religious diversity. “We have
crated you…nations and tribes that
you may ‘know each other.”
But abroad the United States and
Israel in recent years have generated
more rage, anger and hostility than
almost any other country in the
last fifty years. Within America
the United States is fulfilling
God’s purpose of promoting the ideal
of creative diversity. In its actions
abroad, the United States is making
it harder for nations and tribes
to love each other. America’s image
as a role model of humane governance
is tarnished when America descends
to the gutter barbarism of some
of its enemies – as the United States
has lapsed into doing in Iraq.
If the United States wants to be
the ultimate architect of democratic
diversity, it should focus less
on exporting democracy abroad and
more on making its own democracy
in America work better.
This country is more pluralistic
demographically than any other in
the world, but that does not mean
it is adequately pluralistic democratically.
The population demographically consists
of almost every group in the world;
but the political system does not
democratically represent those groups
equitably.
Why is it so rare to have a Black
person elected to the Senate of
the United States? Why have we never
had a woman of any race for Vice
President, let alone President?
How many Muslim Ambassadors are
there representing the United States
abroad?
Jews have excelled in every area
of American endeavour, but why have
we never had a Jewish President
of the United States? Senator Joseph
Lieberman tried hard in 2003 to
win the primary race as a Democratic
presidential candidate for 2004.
Lieberman was not even fourth in
the popular support among Democratic
primary voters.
Where are the Latinos among high
profile Americans? Where are Asian-Americans?
Why does half the population of
the whole of America ignore their
right to vote? Is electoral apathy
in the United States a symptom of
despair with the political system?
Instead of spending billions and
billions of dollars trying to make
Iraq less undemocratic, why do we
not spend half that amount trying
to make the United States more democratic?
America will serve its destiny far
better when it is a universal democratic
nation at home than when it behaves
like a universal empire abroad.
Conclusion
Although the term “globalization”
is indeed new, the forces which
have been creating it have been
going on for generations. It is
only now that we have realized that
the forces at work have had global
repercussions and have been sometimes
global in scale. The new Muslim
migration to the Western world has
turned out to be a manifestation
of globalization. It also helps
to turn the United States into a
truly universal nation.
But is a globalized Planet Earth
really a global village? The world
may be globalized - but what would
make it villagized? There is something
missing - the compassion of the
village has yet to be globalized.
Planet Earth will never really become
a global village until the contraction
of distance is accompanied by the
expansion of empathy. Respect for
difference and celebration of diversity
are needed.
Education world-wide can have a
role in that empathy-creation –
the adventure of getting to know
each other. The rich must learn
to be more sensitive to the poor;
the better endowed be more concerned
about the less; the North must learn
to be more just to the South.
The Qur’an tells us that we have
created tribes and nations that
we may know each other. The best
among us are not white or Black,
Arab or Jew, Christian or Muslim.
The best among us are the most righteous
and virtuous.
[Inna akramakum i’nda Allahi
atqakum]
Shakespeare tells us, “All the world’s
a stage” (As You Like It). The new
millennium proclaims: “All the world
is a village?” A stage is a conceit;
a village is authenticity. The beginning
of wisdom is to know yourself. The
beginning of compassion is to know
your neighbor. That is why God crated
us from a man and a woman, fashioned
us into nations and tribes, that
we may know each other. The forces
of globalization need to respond
to this music of diversity, to this
ethic of human dignity.
|